Thank you very much for a wide-ranging report and analysis of the situation in the UK.
Of course, demoralisation is an effective disempowering tool much favoured by the controllers – and, as you note, it’s working. Not surprising since there have been few, if any, morale-boosting reminders of the enviable and inspiring values we used to practise and hold dear.
Perhaps I can just add a couple of thoughts. The absence of visible policing, allowing crime to proliferate or, even when the police are present, proving themselves to be inept, is, I believe, deliberate. Such deteriorating situations encourage the public to demand solutions that will inevitably lead to more surveillance. And surveillance is exactly what the technocrats desire. The same game is being played out in various shops where the security guards are under orders not to detain shoplifters. The public are furious. The answer will be more surveillance cameras.
It seems that a fundamental lesson from history – rulers do not necessarily have our best interests at heart – is never learned.
Unfortunately the British people trusted Government and thought they would act in the interest of the citizens.
I quote:
"Human history, especially that of the civilized world, reveals that the vast majority of people have always exhibited a strong tendency to readily rely on the ruling or formal authorities (or bodies of authority) for guidance and entities to place their trust into, despite that this trust has consistently and reliably been undermined by the reigning authorities –and thus, has largely been unjustified– throughout the ages."- Taken from Rolf Hefti. This was written about by psychologist Arthur Janov in 2015.
The fact that they put "safety" in the title is all the proof you need that it's lethally dangerous legislation. The text--the deliberate vagueness, failure to define terms, and subjectivity that will let the kakistocracy interpret and apply it with infinite elasticity--is beside the point.
Whether Starmer intends to provoke riots or whether he's counting on Brits to remain passive and compliant, he'll get what he wants either way, which is a globalist boot on the country's neck. He'll get it at no existential cost to himself and his minions, too, because the UK and most of the rest of the western world long ago decided that self-defense is unsophisticated and icky. They're not afraid of you, but you should make them that way.
Now then comrade Amy, that's the kind of comment that could undermine and overthrow the establishment...I think the scale of all the nefarious things the intelligence agencies are involved with would be too much for most people to comprehend - which is why 'they' get away with it all. Just like the C19 injection democide.
Is it fairly easy for an average British citizen to move elsewhere and work, such as in Australia? It seems so methodical how they are dismantling that country, stripping everyone of their wealth and health.
I guess it's easier without dependents, whether those are elderly family members or children. I haven't found any Brits keen to go to Australia since their government went full tilt totalitarian during Convid. I've lured a few friends here and three have stayed over a year now. Others are going to European countries, living in the countryside. Most people I know are stuck in the UK with crushing debt, it's rough.
Bravo Nicholas, I will be including your excellent analysis in my 'Letter from GB' on April 19. In South Africa we have a stronger constitution and of course it is defined and immutable.
Thank you very much for a wide-ranging report and analysis of the situation in the UK.
Of course, demoralisation is an effective disempowering tool much favoured by the controllers – and, as you note, it’s working. Not surprising since there have been few, if any, morale-boosting reminders of the enviable and inspiring values we used to practise and hold dear.
Perhaps I can just add a couple of thoughts. The absence of visible policing, allowing crime to proliferate or, even when the police are present, proving themselves to be inept, is, I believe, deliberate. Such deteriorating situations encourage the public to demand solutions that will inevitably lead to more surveillance. And surveillance is exactly what the technocrats desire. The same game is being played out in various shops where the security guards are under orders not to detain shoplifters. The public are furious. The answer will be more surveillance cameras.
It seems that a fundamental lesson from history – rulers do not necessarily have our best interests at heart – is never learned.
Unfortunately the British people trusted Government and thought they would act in the interest of the citizens.
I quote:
"Human history, especially that of the civilized world, reveals that the vast majority of people have always exhibited a strong tendency to readily rely on the ruling or formal authorities (or bodies of authority) for guidance and entities to place their trust into, despite that this trust has consistently and reliably been undermined by the reigning authorities –and thus, has largely been unjustified– throughout the ages."- Taken from Rolf Hefti. This was written about by psychologist Arthur Janov in 2015.
The fact that they put "safety" in the title is all the proof you need that it's lethally dangerous legislation. The text--the deliberate vagueness, failure to define terms, and subjectivity that will let the kakistocracy interpret and apply it with infinite elasticity--is beside the point.
Whether Starmer intends to provoke riots or whether he's counting on Brits to remain passive and compliant, he'll get what he wants either way, which is a globalist boot on the country's neck. He'll get it at no existential cost to himself and his minions, too, because the UK and most of the rest of the western world long ago decided that self-defense is unsophisticated and icky. They're not afraid of you, but you should make them that way.
I pretty much think the main point of these acts is to considate control of the illegal buisinesses they are already into. What sex trafficking?
Now then comrade Amy, that's the kind of comment that could undermine and overthrow the establishment...I think the scale of all the nefarious things the intelligence agencies are involved with would be too much for most people to comprehend - which is why 'they' get away with it all. Just like the C19 injection democide.
Is it fairly easy for an average British citizen to move elsewhere and work, such as in Australia? It seems so methodical how they are dismantling that country, stripping everyone of their wealth and health.
I guess it's easier without dependents, whether those are elderly family members or children. I haven't found any Brits keen to go to Australia since their government went full tilt totalitarian during Convid. I've lured a few friends here and three have stayed over a year now. Others are going to European countries, living in the countryside. Most people I know are stuck in the UK with crushing debt, it's rough.
Bravo Nicholas, I will be including your excellent analysis in my 'Letter from GB' on April 19. In South Africa we have a stronger constitution and of course it is defined and immutable.