For a long time I rejected the idea of a coordinated effort by the parasite class to impose its sick idea of utopia on normal people. A convincing appearance of coordination can be produced when people hold the same ideological premises. In the case of the parasite class those premises can lead them in only one direction: toward communism. Until 2020 I'd have argued that until the cows came home.
Now I'm not sure whether it's a coordinated, explicit plan or not. Covid was definitely coordinated, explicit, and rehearsed. The CIA's machinations are coordinated and explicitly planned. Obama's not living in DC because the weather's fabulous. Skank Ho Harris is obviously doing some kind of dog whistle incantation and gesture; the mere fact that the left is always screaming about "dog whistles" is evidence enough that they employ them themselves: Communists always project. The WEF, WHO, UN, et al sit around doodling lapel pin designs for themselves for a reason. They incestuously network with each other, with cloyingly-named NGOs, with the universities, media, and with their captive politicians. Is that because they share a common ideological premise--that we're the means to their ends--or is that evidence of long-term plotting?
Ultimately it doesn't matter. From human prehistory to the present, there's always been just one fundamental choice confronting humanity: a single issue, regardless of the political trappings, regardless of whether those making the choice are wearing bearskins or Armani, and regardless of whether the conflict is global or between two neighbors. The choice is individualism or collectivism. Most people have never evolved beyond the "see, want, kill you for it" mentality of cave dwellers, whether they collect welfare or distribute it, and whether they rule or want to be ruled. How one answers the individualism/collectivism question underlies everything else he does in his personal life and everything he supports or opposes politically. Every pathology you see in the world today can ultimately be traced to people making the wrong choice, and all those pathologies can be fought only by making the right one.
The way to fight that evil--whether it's incidental or pushed deliberately--is with an iron conviction that the only moral approach to human relationships is the one that abolishes the initiation of force and views the individual as an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. Anything else is just a variation on the primordial collectivist theme.
"You might scoff at what I write in this post."
NOPE.
Great post. Informative and intriguing. Thank you.
For a long time I rejected the idea of a coordinated effort by the parasite class to impose its sick idea of utopia on normal people. A convincing appearance of coordination can be produced when people hold the same ideological premises. In the case of the parasite class those premises can lead them in only one direction: toward communism. Until 2020 I'd have argued that until the cows came home.
Now I'm not sure whether it's a coordinated, explicit plan or not. Covid was definitely coordinated, explicit, and rehearsed. The CIA's machinations are coordinated and explicitly planned. Obama's not living in DC because the weather's fabulous. Skank Ho Harris is obviously doing some kind of dog whistle incantation and gesture; the mere fact that the left is always screaming about "dog whistles" is evidence enough that they employ them themselves: Communists always project. The WEF, WHO, UN, et al sit around doodling lapel pin designs for themselves for a reason. They incestuously network with each other, with cloyingly-named NGOs, with the universities, media, and with their captive politicians. Is that because they share a common ideological premise--that we're the means to their ends--or is that evidence of long-term plotting?
Ultimately it doesn't matter. From human prehistory to the present, there's always been just one fundamental choice confronting humanity: a single issue, regardless of the political trappings, regardless of whether those making the choice are wearing bearskins or Armani, and regardless of whether the conflict is global or between two neighbors. The choice is individualism or collectivism. Most people have never evolved beyond the "see, want, kill you for it" mentality of cave dwellers, whether they collect welfare or distribute it, and whether they rule or want to be ruled. How one answers the individualism/collectivism question underlies everything else he does in his personal life and everything he supports or opposes politically. Every pathology you see in the world today can ultimately be traced to people making the wrong choice, and all those pathologies can be fought only by making the right one.
The way to fight that evil--whether it's incidental or pushed deliberately--is with an iron conviction that the only moral approach to human relationships is the one that abolishes the initiation of force and views the individual as an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. Anything else is just a variation on the primordial collectivist theme.