Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Amy Sukwan's avatar

I have eaten the bugs in Thailand. I tried scorpion once it was terribly bitter. Most were drunken one time forays with a few exceptions: I like the ant larvae salad, which my mother in law gathered in season (I had a problem with eating the live ants) and she also collected mang noom in May or so every year, which is a type of large beetle. She used to say that ze bugs were her bestsellers with farang, but since the backlash over the eating ze bugs thing, you can't find anyone that sells them in Phuket anymore. I suppose I always differentiated among traditional foods and those that involve massive corporate investment..

Expand full comment
Fager 132's avatar

There's no way I can do any better than Paul Driessen on this topic, so here he is:

"Of course, natural forces can’t drive climate hysteria and WEF-Gore-Biden anti-fossil-fuel agendas. Fear-mongering political, activist, media and academic elites therefore ignore them. In the Real World, the wondrous reality is that, after centuries of excruciatingly slow progress, agricultural advances over the past 75 years have been nothing short of astonishing. Dr. Norman Borlaug’s Green Revolution employed plant breeding techniques that multiplied yields of vital grain crops, saving hundreds of millions of lives.

"Since 1950, American farmers increased per-acre corn yields by an incredible 500% and other crop yields by smaller but still amazing amounts – while using used less land, water and fuel … and fewer fertilizers and pesticides per ton of produce. Their exports helped slash global hunger and malnutrition even further. Meanwhile, despite supposed impacts from manmade climate change, farmers in Brazil, India and many other countries have also enjoyed record harvests.

The full article is here: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/07/20/waging-war-on-modern-agriculture-and-global-nutrition/ The point is that there's no reason to eat bugs unless you're into that--or unless you're into genocide. To the WEF, WHO, UN, and other assorted Nut Zero psychopaths, the saving of hundreds of millions of human lives is a bad thing. To anyone else the fact that science, innovation, creativity, and ambition combine to feed more people on less land with fewer resources is a net positive.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts